Giulia Morlet vs Amelie Van Impe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Morlet vs A. Van Impe

Giulia Morlet
FRA
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
21
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
617
0
Best Rank
456
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Amelie Van Impe
BEL
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
21
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
617
0
Best Rank
456
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Morlet 1 - 0 Impe
They have played 3 sets in total, with Giulia Morlet winning 2 and Amelie Van Impe winning 1. The last match between Giulia Morlet and Amelie Van Impe was at the W15 Monastir, 18-02-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Giulia Morlet getting the victory 3-6 6-2 10-7.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Morlet | 1 |
| Impe | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W15 Monastir(02-18-25)
Giulia Morlet
3
6
10
Amelie Van Impe
6
2
7
G. Morlet vs A. V. Impe H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.30% (51-35) | Career Total W/L | 64.06% (123-69) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Morlet vs A. V. Impe Match Preview:
- In recent form of their second serve performance, Impe and Morlet have displayed contrasting outcomes. Over the past six months, Impe has exhibited a commendable prowess by winning 45.86% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Morlet's recent performance in this aspect has been relatively less impressive, with a win percentage of 40.82%. Of notable importance to underscore is the strong correlation between this statistical representation and the accuracy of match predictions.
- An examination of return game statistics, with a focus on recent form, sheds light on the proficiency of Impe and Morlet. In terms of return stats, Impe's recent performance signifies a significant triumph, having won 55.9% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Morlet's recent success rate in this domain stands at 58.82%. When considering first serve returns, Impe possesses a win percentage of 41.96%, whereas Morlet exhibits a slightly higher rate of 44%. It is worth emphasizing that these statistics hold a firm correlation to determine the favored player in their upcoming head-to-head matchup.
- Undoubtedly, an analysis of the players' ability to handle pressure serves as a pivotal aspect for making in-game betting predictions. With respect to recent form, Impe has demonstrated exceptional resilience by saving 57.8% of breakpoints. Meanwhile, Morlet has showcased a respectable 52.5% proficiency in saving breakpoints. Such statistics prove invaluable when determining potential outcomes during live betting.
- An overview of performance over the past year provides valuable insights into the players' winning records. Impe has achieved success in 60.71% of matches played, boasting an overall record of 17 wins and 11 losses. In contrast, Morlet has exhibited remarkable dominance with a staggering win rate of 75%, comprising 18 victories and a mere 6 defeats. Considering these statistics, a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview emerges.
- Examining the players' performance on different surfaces helps discern their respective strengths and weaknesses. Impe thrives on clay courts, boasting a noteworthy win rate of 66% (47 wins and 24 losses). However, their performance on indoor hard courts is comparatively lower, with a win percentage of 59% (10 wins and 7 losses). On the other hand, Morlet exhibits remarkable skill on hard courts, achieving a 65% success rate (33 wins and 18 losses). Conversely, their record on indoor hard courts is less favorable, with a win percentage of 0% (0 wins and 2 losses).
- Player level plays a significant role, as it outlines the level at which the competitors have been participating in tournaments. Over the past year, Impe has primarily engaged in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, triumphing in an impressive 78.57% of matches (11 wins and 3 losses). Similarly, Morlet has predominantly competed in the same category of tournaments, achieving a commendable win rate of 75% (18 wins and 6 losses). When comparing the statistics between players to predict the favored competitor, it is crucial to consider the relative event level at which they have been actively participating.
- Insights gleaned from opponent quality statistics provide further nuance for predicting player performance. Over the past 12 months, Impe has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 363.04. In contrast, Morlet has faced players with an average ranking of 235.83. These figures serve as informative indicators to gauge the level of competition faced by each player.
- Delving into performance during deciding sets offers compelling possibilities for live predictions and betting strategies. In the past 12 months, Impe has proven to be adept in decisive moments, winning 40% of deciding sets. Morlet, while slightly trailing in this regard, has demonstrated proficiency by winning 33% of all matches played on the tour. Therefore, it is pertinent to consider these statistics when engaging in live betting.
- While past player performance provides valuable insights, current event statistics offer further indications of players' form and aptitude. Therefore, it is essential to analyze the current event stats for players who have participated in the ongoing tournament. Notably, some athletes showcase superior performance levels in specific events, and this factor should be meticulously considered when predicting match outcomes. To review the current event stats, please refer to the section below (if the players have already competed in the current event).
- Break point conversion statistics reveal crucial moments during a match that can greatly influence in-game live betting. In their recent form, Impe has converted 57.06% of breakpoint opportunities, while Morlet has achieved a success rate of 50% in breaking their opponents' serve. These statistics serve as telling indicators when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
- For those intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it is important to note that its contents cater specifically to the analytical minds enthralled by statistical complications.
Giulia Morlet vs Amelie Van Impe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Morlet vs A. V. Impe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 15 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:0:38 | Average Match Time | 2:0:38 |
| 77% (56/73) | 1st Serve % | 45% (27/60) |
| 57% (32/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 41% (7/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (17/33) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 50% (30/60) | Return Points Win % | 47% (34/73) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Morlet 40%, Impe 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Morlet 56%, Impe 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Morlet 48%, Impe 52%.
G. Morlet Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-3 0-6 10-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(2) 3-6 10-6 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
A. V. Impe Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-7 6-2 10-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 5-7 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||

G. Morlet vs A. V. Impe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.30% (51/35) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.06% (123/69) |
| 56.38% (106/82) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.73% (276/164) |
| 54.38% (907/761) | Games Win/Loss | 55.23% (2198/1782) |
| 62.50% (40/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.82% (34/21) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.26% (76/37) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.17% (13/11) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 74 | Aces Total | 206 |
| 0.43 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 346 | Total Double Faults | 548 |
| 1:13:38 | Average Match Time | 1:33:56 |
| 416.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.79 |
| 57% (2220/3927) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7315/11335) |
| 60% (1325/2220) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (4437/7315) |
| 41% (706/1707) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1845/4020) |
| 51% (253/493) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (784/1542) |
| 48% (1788/3722) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5546/11548) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 53.33% (40/35) |
| 61.45% (51/32) | Futures W/L | 70.94% (83/34) |
| 58% (49/84) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (123/190) |
| 62% (8/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (22/38) |
| 61% (11/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (28/58) |
| 92% (49/45) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (127/109) |
| 8% (49/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (127/18) |
| 14% (37/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (65/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 19 Dec, 01:00 PM
PredictionFri, 19 Dec, 02:00 PM
PredictionFri, 19 Dec, 08:00 AM
PredictionFri, 19 Dec, 03:30 PM
PredictionFri, 19 Dec, 07:00 PM
PredictionFri, 19 Dec, 12:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Landaluce H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

18 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Kjaer Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

18 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

18 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Prizmic Vs Engel H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

17 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Learner Tien vs Rafael Jodar Prediction – ATP Next Gen ATP Finals – 17th December 2025 Best Bets

17 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Alexander Blockx
Dino Prizmic
Nishesh Basavareddy
Justin Engel
Martin Landaluce
Rafael Jodar
Learner Tien
Nicolai Budkov KjaerSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
15:30
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
19:00
H2H 0-0
20:30
H2H 0-0